Study Zevachim folio 81A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
And if you would say that here too, the Mishnah is discussing a case where the measure of 4 placements was mixed with precisely the amount of one placement, and therefore the priest certainly placed some blood of both offerings, if so, how would one explain the clause in the Mishnah that states: R
Rather, Rava says: R' Eliezer and the Rabbis do not disagree with regard to a case of actual blood mixed together. When they disagree it is with regard to a case of cups of blood that were intermingled, and it is unknown which blood is in which cup. The explanation according to R' Eliezer is that h
The Talmud asks: And do they not disagree with regard to blood mixed together? But isn’t it taught in a baraita: R' Yehuda said: R' Eliezer and the Rabbis did not disagree in a case of blood of a sin offering that was mixed with blood of a burnt offering that the mixture shall be sacrificed, or in
The Talmud answers: R' Yehuda, in accordance with the opinion of R' Eliezer, i.e., when R' Yehuda teaches the opinion of R' Eliezer, teaches that the dispute applies both in a case of blood mixed together and in a case of intermingled cups, but the Rabbis who taught the Mishnah maintain that R' Eli
§ The Mishnah teaches that if the blood of a sin offering, which is to be placed above the red line, was mixed with blood of a burnt offering, which is to be placed below the line, R' Eliezer holds that it shall all be placed above the red line, and one views the blood of the burnt offering placed t