Study Zevachim folio 120A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
that one brought inside and subsequently took outside, what is the halakha? Does it have the status of a sacrificial item of a public altar? The Talmud clarifies the question: Do we say that once it was brought in the partition has already absorbed it, and all halakhot of sacrificial items of a pub
The Talmud asks: Isn’t this issue a disagreement between Rabba and Rav Yosef? As we learned in a Mishnah (Me’ila 2a): With regard to offerings of the most sacred order, e.g., a sin offering or a guilt offering, that were slaughtered in the south of the Temple courtyard, and not in the north as dict
And a dilemma was raised before the rabbis: If they did descend the altar, what is the halakha with regard to ascending again? Rabba says: They shall not ascend, and Rav Yosef says: They shall ascend. Consequently, they disagree with regard to the issue of whether an item that is not fit to be sacr
The Talmud responds: The disagreements are not identical, as the dilemma can be raised according to the opinion of Rabba, and the dilemma can be raised according to the opinion of Rav Yosef. The Talmud elaborates: It is possible to raise the dilemma according to the opinion of Rabba, as Rabba say
Or perhaps the dilemma of the burnt offering of a private altar can be raised even according to the opinion of Rav Yosef. Rav Yosef states his opinion there, that offerings of the most sacred order that were slaughtered in the south of the Temple courtyard and descended the altar shall ascend again