Study Zevachim folio 114B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
should also receive lashes for sacrificing it, just as one would for violating other Torah prohibitions. Why did R' Zeira say elsewhere that one who slaughters, inside the Temple courtyard, an offering whose time has not yet arrived does not receive lashes for having violated the prohibition of: “It
The Talmud responds: That statement of R' Zeira applies only according to the opinion of the Rabbis, who disagree with R' Shimon in the Mishnah and hold that the verse that states: “You shall not do,” does not indicate that one who slaughters an animal whose time has not yet arrived is in violation
Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: R' Zeira’s statement is even in accordance with the opinion of R' Shimon, who also holds that one would not receive lashes for slaughtering inside the Temple courtyard an offering whose time has not yet arrived. A prohibition cannot be derived from the prohibition state
Rabba said: The reason of R' Shimon is not based upon: “You shall not do,” as Reish Lakish claims, but upon another verse. As it is taught in a baraita that R' Shimon says: From where is it derived that one who slaughters his Paschal offering on a private altar at a time when it is prohibited to sac
One might have thought that even at a time when it is permitted to sacrifice offerings on private altars this is so. Therefore, the verse states: “Within any [be’aḥad] of your gates,” which indicates that I said this prohibition to you only when all of the Jewish people enter the Temple through on