Study Zevachim folio 112A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
Talmud: The Talmud discusses the first clause of the Mishnah: Granted that one is liable in a case where he first placed the blood on an altar outside the courtyard and then placed the remaining blood on the altar inside the courtyard; that is because, as the Mishnah explains: As the blood in its e
The Talmud explains: In accordance with whose opinion is this Mishnah? It is in accordance with the opinion of R' Neḥemya, who says: For the remainder of the blood of an offering that was supposed to be poured at the base of the altar and that instead one sacrificed outside the courtyard, one is li
The Talmud asks: If the Mishnah is in accordance with the opinion of R' Neḥemya, then say the latter clause: If one collected its blood in two cups and placed the blood from both of them on the altar inside the courtyard, he is exempt. If he placed the blood from both of them on an altar outside
The Talmud answers: In the latter clause we arrive at the opinion of the first tanna, who disagrees with R' Elazar, son of R' Shimon. As that tanna says: The placement of the blood from one cup renders the blood of the other cup as disqualified. Since it is actually disqualified and not merely a
§ The Mishnah presents an analogy for its ruling: To what is this matter comparable? It is comparable to a case where one separated an animal for his sin offering and it was lost, and he separated another animal in its place, and thereafter, the first animal was found.