Study Zevachim folio 100A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
It is not difficult. Here, in the baraita where R' Shimon holds an acute mourner may not send a Paschal offering, since acute mourning at night is by Torah law, it is referring to a case where his relative died on the 14th day of Nisan and he buried him on the 14th itself. There, the ruling in the
Rav Mari explains: In a case where his relative died on the 14th day of Nisan and he buried him on the 14th itself, his acute mourning is due to the day of death and is therefore by Torah law. Consequently, it takes hold of its following night by Torah law, and the mitzva of the Paschal offering do
Rav Ashi said to Rav Mari: But if so, it is difficult to understand that which the baraita teaches: R' Shimon said to R' Yehuda: Know that this so, as the rabbis said: An acute mourner immerses on the 14th of Nisan and partakes of his Paschal offering in the evening, but he may not partake of other
Abaye said a different resolution to the contradiction between the statements of R' Shimon: It is not difficult. Here, in the baraita where R' Shimon holds that an acute mourner may not send a Paschal offering, it is referring to a case where his relative died before midday on the 14th of Nisan. Th
The Talmud explains: And from where do you say that the halakha is different depending on whether his relative died before midday on the 14th of Nisan or whether he died after midday? As it is taught in a baraita: The Torah states with regard to a priest: “And for his sister a virgin, that is near u