Study Pesachim folio 102A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
Who is the tanna that taught that even in cases of uprooting oneself from a meal that requires a blessing of significance afterward, one nevertheless is required to recite a new blessing before resuming his meal?
It is R' Yehuda, as it was taught in a baraita: With regard to friends who were reclining and eating a meal and uprooted themselves to go to the synagogue or to the study hall, when they exit, these foods do not require a blessing to be recited afterward, and when they return, these foods do not re
The Talmud infers from the above baraita: The reason for this halakha is that it is only with regard to items of food that require a blessing after them in their place, that when the people eating them exit, these foods do not require a blessing to be recited afterward, and when they return, these
The Talmud suggests: Shall we say that this is a conclusive refutation of the opinion of R' Yoḥanan, who holds that a change of location never obligates one to recite a new blessing? The Talmud expresses surprise at this proposition: But didn’t we already refute R' Yoḥanan’s opinion once? Why is i
The Talmud responds that R' Yoḥanan’s ruling cannot be definitively refuted from this baraita, as R' Yoḥanan could have said to you: The same is true that even with regard to items of food that do not require a blessing afterward in their place, the people who ate them are also not required to reci