Study Nedarim folio 23B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
The Talmud answers: The Mishnah is incomplete and is teaching like this: In the case of one who wants another to eat with him, and he urges him to do so and makes a vow with regard to him, this vow is included in the category of vows of exhortation, which do not require dissolution. And in additio
The Talmud asks: If he remembers at the time of the vow that his intent at the beginning of the year was to render it void but still makes the vow, then he has uprooted his stipulation that all his vows are void and has upheld his vow. Why, then, does it state that the vows are void in this case? A
Rava said: Actually, say as we said initially, that he does remember his stipulation at the time of the vow. With what are we dealing here? It is a case where he stipulated a condition on Rosh HaShana rendering void vows that he would make later in the year, but he did not know with regard to whi
The Talmud relates that Rav Huna bar Ḥinnana intended to teach this topic at the Festival lecture, so that everyone would learn this manner of rendering vows void on Rosh HaShana. Rava said to him: The tanna of the Mishnah conceals it and does not say it explicitly, despite the fact that it is stu
§ A dilemma was raised before the scholars: Do the Rabbis disagree with R' Eliezer ben Ya’akov in the Mishnah or not? And if you say that they disagree with him, is the halakha in accordance with his opinion or not? The Talmud suggests a proof: Come and hear, as we learned in a Mishnah (63b): One w