Study Gittin folio 65B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
However, it is not a valid bill of divorce until you reach Mata Meḥasya.
The Mishnah teaches that if the woman said to the agent: Receive my bill of divorce for me in such and such a place, R' Elazar prohibits her from partaking of teruma immediately. The Talmud asks: That is obvious, as she is merely indicating a place for him to receive the bill of divorce and not sti
The Talmud answers: No, R' Elazar’s ruling is necessary in a case where she said to him: Go to the east, as my husband is in the east, and the agent went to the west. Lest you say that since the husband is certainly not in the west and the agent will not find him there, the bill of divorce will cer
The Talmud cites a related halakha. With regard to one who says to his agent: Establish an eiruv of Shabbat boundaries on my behalf with dates, and he established an eiruv on his behalf with dried figs, or if said to his agent: Establish an eiruv on my behalf with dried figs, and he established an
Rabba said: This is not difficult. This baraita, in which it is taught that it is not a valid eiruv, is in accordance with the opinion of the Rabbis, and that baraita, in which it is taught that it is a valid eiruv, is in accordance with the opinion of R' Elazar. He explains: This baraita is in a