Study Yevamot folio 91A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
The Talmud asks: It is obvious that she is disqualified, as she is a zona, a woman who has had sex with a man forbidden to her by the Torah and with whom she cannot establish a marital bond. The Talmud answers: Since it was necessary for the tanna to mention the disqualification of a daughter of a L
The Talmud asks: And a daughter of a Levite, is she disqualified from partaking of the tithe by licentiousness? But isn’t it taught in a baraita: In the case of a Levite woman who was captured, who may have had sex with one of her captors, or even in a case where a Levite woman definitely engaged i
§ The Mishnah further taught that the daughter of a priest in this situation is disqualified from partaking of teruma. The Talmud explains: This statement does not refer to teruma by Torah law, as it is obvious that she is prohibited to eat this produce. Rather, she is barred even from teruma that
§ And the Mishnah also taught: Neither the heirs of this one nor the heirs of that one inherit her marriage contract. The Talmud asks: A marriage contract, what is its purpose; why mention the inheritance of a marriage contract after the Mishnah has just said that she is not entitled to the paymen
The Talmud asks: This is obvious. Since she does not have a claim for the payment of her marriage contract, she is not entitled to the other conditions of a marriage contract either. The Talmud answers: It is necessary. Lest you say that with regard to the woman herself, who committed a prohibition