Study Yevamot folio 110A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
What, is it not a case where he did not have sex with her after she reached majority? If so, Rav thinks that even when he did not have sex with her, her marriage is fully realized once she reaches majority. The Talmud rejects this: No, this is referring to a case where he did have sex with her. Th
The Talmud asks: But if this is the basis of the dispute, they already disagreed about this once, as it was stated with regard to the following case: A man betrothed a woman on some condition, and married her without mentioning the condition, and the condition was not fulfilled. Rav says: She requir
The Talmud explains: Rav says she requires a bill of divorce from him, for since he married her, he apparently retracted his condition, and is therefore married to her even though the condition was not met. And Shmuel says: She does not require a bill of divorce from him, because anyone who has s
The Talmud answers: It is necessary to state the dispute in both contexts, for if only that halakha about conditional betrothal was stated, one might think: In this case Rav says she needs a divorce since there is a condition with regard to the betrothal, but when he had sex with her, he retracted
The Talmud asks: And did Rav actually say that when he had sex with her, yes, the original marriage is valid, and if he did not have sex with her, no, it is not valid? Wasn’t there an incident in the city of Neresh where a woman was betrothed when she was a minor, and she reached majority, and the