Study Sukkah folio 24A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
R' Yehuda and R' Yosei and R' Shimon prohibit one from doing so due to the concern lest the wineskin burst and the contents spill before he has an opportunity to actually separate the teruma and tithes. In that case, when he drank the wine, retroactively, he is found to have drunk untithed produce.
The Talmud suggests: Reverse the attribution of the statements according to Abaye. R' Meir is concerned about potential death, and R' Yehuda is not concerned about potential death, as it is taught in a baraita: If one utilized his animal as a wall for the sukka, R' Meir deems it unfit and R' Yehuda
The Talmud asks: This is difficult, as there is a contradiction between the statement of R' Meir with regard to sukka, where he is concerned about potential death, and the other statement of R' Meir with regard to separation of teruma and tithes, where he is not concerned lest the wineskin burst. T
The Talmud asks: This is difficult, as there is a contradiction between the statement of R' Yehuda with regard to sukka, where he is not concerned about potential death, and the other statement of R' Yehuda with regard to separation of teruma and tithes, where he is concerned lest the wineskin burs
The Talmud answers: The rationale for the opinion of R' Yehuda with regard to tithes is not due to the fact that he is concerned about the potential bursting of the wineskin; rather, he rules that one may not drink the wine because he is not of the opinion that there is a principle of retroactive c