Study Pesachim folio 100A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
Perhaps this baraita is corrupted, and therefore it cannot serve as the basis of an objection.
Mareimar said to him, and some say it was Rav Yeimar: I happened to come to the Festival lecture of Rav Pineḥas, son of Rav Ami, and the tanna who recited mishnayot stood up and taught this baraita before him, and he accepted it. This incident proves that the above version of the baraita is accepte
The Talmud asks: And according to the explanation of Rav Huna, does it work out well? But didn’t R' Yirmeya say that R' Yoḥanan said, and some say that R' Abbahu said that R' Yosei bar R' Ḥanina said: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of R' Yehuda with regard to the eve of Passover, and
The Talmud infers from the above statement: From the fact that it was necessary to say that the halakha is in accordance with the opinion of R' Yehuda with regard to the eve of Passover, this proves by inference that R' Yosei disagrees with regard to both cases, both the eves of Shabbat and other F
The Talmud answers: No; the statement should be understood as follows: When it was said that the halakha is in accordance with the opinion of R' Yehuda, this proves by inference that they disagree with regard to interruption. Even R' Yosei agrees that one may not start eating on Passover eve from