Study Nedarim folio 67A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
If the father nullified her vow and the husband did not nullify it, or if the husband nullified it and the father did not nullify it, then the vow is not nullified. And needless to say, it is not nullified if one of them ratified the vow.
Talmud: The Mishnah states that if the father nullified her vow and the husband did not nullify it, or if the husband nullified it and the father did not nullify it, then the vow is not nullified. The Talmud asks: Is this not the same as the first clause of the Mishnah, which states: Her father and
At the end of the Mishnah it is stated: And needless to say, it is not nullified if one of them ratified the vow. The Talmud asks: Why do I need the Mishnah to teach this? Now, it was stated that if one of them nullified the vow without the other, it is nothing, her vow is not nullified. If one
The Talmud answers: It was necessary for the Mishnah to mention this in a case where one of them nullified the vow and the other one ratified it, and the one who ratified the woman’s vow retracted and requested dissolution of his ratification from a halakhic authority, who dissolved it. Lest you say
§ The Mishnah teaches: And with regard to a betrothed young woman, her father and her husband nullify her vows. The Talmud asks: From where do we derive this halakha? Since she is still in her father’s house, he should be authorized to nullify her vows by himself. Rabba said: The verse states: “And