Study Nedarim folio 24B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
mean that even in the earlier cases, where he did not become irritated, they disagree with regard to vows of exhortation and hold that these vows are indeed valid, and can one conclude from here that the Rabbis disagree with him? The Talmud concludes: Conclude from here that this is so.
With regard to the practical conclusion of this dispute, the Talmud asks: What halakhic conclusion was reached about this matter? Does the halakha follow the opinion of the Rabbis or that of R' Eliezer ben Ya’akov? The Talmud answers: Come and hear that which Rav Huna said: The halakha is in accord
Mishnah: Vows of exaggeration that the rabbis dissolved without a request to a halakhic authority, as described in the first Mishnah in the chapter, include the following examples. If one said concerning a certain item: It is konam for me if I did not see on this road as many people as those who as
Talmud: A Sage taught: Items rendered forbidden through vows of exaggeration [havai] are permitted; items rendered forbidden through oaths of exaggeration are forbidden. Since oaths are very severe, one does not take an oath unless he intends it seriously. Therefore, it is not viewed as an oath
The Talmud clarifies the details: What are the circumstances of the case of oaths of exaggeration? If we say that it is when one said: I take an oath if I did not see on this road as many people as those who ascended from Egypt, is he saying anything? This statement is not formulated in the form o