Study Nazir folio 30B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
the Mishnah therefore teaches us that it is a halakha that is unrelated to inheritance; there is simply a tradition that a son can use the offerings for his father’s naziriteship while a daughter cannot.
§ A dilemma was raised before the rabbis: Do the Rabbis disagree with R' Yosei, or do they not disagree? If you say they disagree, do they take issue with the first clause or with the latter clause of his halakha? The Talmud suggests an answer: Come and hear the following baraita: How did the rabbi
With regard to one whose father was a nazirite and his father separated money for his naziriteship and died, and the son said: I am hereby a nazirite on the condition that I can shave by using my father’s money, this is the one who can shave by means of his father’s money. However, if a son and his
R' Eliezer, and R' Meir, and R' Yehuda said: This is the one who can shave by using his father’s money. Their emphasis of: This is the one, indicates that they disagree with R' Yosei entirely. In other words, where R' Yosei rules that one can use his father’s money, they maintain that he cannot do
§ Rabba raised a dilemma: If a father has two nazirite sons, what is the halakha? The Talmud clarifies the sides of the dilemma: Does one say that we learned it as a halakha that a son can shave using money left for his father’s naziriteship, and therefore any son who precedes his brother and shave