Study Ketubot folio 78B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
The Talmud replies: Come and hear an answer to this question, as it is taught in a baraita: R' Yehuda said that they said before Rabban Gamliel: Since this one, when she is fully married, is legally his wife, and that one, when she is merely betrothed, is legally his wife, therefore, just as for t
It is taught in a baraita: R' Ḥanina ben Akavya said that Rabban Gamliel did not respond to the rabbis in that manner. Rather, this is what he replied to them: No, if you said that the sale is void with regard to a married woman, concerning whom the husband has many rights, as her husband is entitle
The rabbis said to him: my teacher! this reasoning is accepted if she sold it for herself before she was married, but if she was married and afterward sold the property she had earlier inherited, what is the halakha? Rabban Gamliel said to them: Even this one may sell the property and give it away,
The Talmud raises a difficulty: But didn’t we learn in the Mishnah: If she inherited property before she was married and was later married, Rabban Gamliel says: If she sold it or gave the property away, the transaction is valid. The wording of the baraita, in contrast, indicates that she may sell o
Rav Zevid said: Teach the text of the Mishnah as follows: She may sell and give away the property, and her transaction is valid. Rav Pappa stated another answer: This is not difficult, as this Mishnah is consistent with the opinion of R' Yehuda according to the opinion of Rabban Gamliel, but that