Study Gittin folio 25B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
And he deconsecrates the second tithe that he will separate in the future, transferring its sanctity to money, and he may drink the wine immediately, relying on the separation that he will perform later, which will clarify retroactively which log he designated for the tithes and for teruma. This is
By contrast, in a case where one makes the outcome dependent on the decision of others, R' Yehuda accepts the principle of retroactive clarification, as we learned in a Mishnah (73a): In a case where an ill husband says to his wife: This is your bill of divorce from now if I die due to this illness
R' Yehuda says: She is like a married woman with regard to all of her matters, and she remains forbidden to other men; and when he will die, it is a bill of divorce. Death is equivalent to a matter that is dependent on the decision of others. Since R' Yehuda agrees that the bill of divorce takes e
Furthermore, Rav Mesharshiyya said to Rava: But isn’t there R' Shimon, who, in a case where one makes the outcome dependent on his own decision, does not accept the principle of retroactive clarification, but when one makes it dependent on the decision of others, he accepts the principle of retroac
The Talmud elaborates: When one makes the outcome dependent on his own decision, R' Shimon does not accept the principle of retroactive clarification. This is understood from that which we said in the case of wine purchased from Samaritans. When one makes the outcome dependent on the decision of o