Study Yevamot folio 87A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
The daughter of a priest married to an Israelite may not partake of teruma. If the Israelite died and she has a son from him, she may not partake of teruma as long as that son is alive. If she subsequently married a Levite she may partake of tithe. If he died, and she had a son from him, she may s
If her son from the priest also died, she may not partake of teruma, but she may partake of tithe, as she has a son from a Levite. If her son from the Levite died, she may no longer partake of tithe. If her son from the Israelite died, she returns to her father’s house and may once again partake o
Talmud: We learned in the Mishnah: If her son from the Levite died she may partake of teruma. The Talmud asks: This halakha with regard to a woman previously married to a priest, who had a child from the priest and was then married to a Levite and separated from him, that she once again may partak
The Talmud asks: In accordance with the opinion of which Sage is this exposition? Is it only in accordance with R' Akiva, who expounds the additional letter vav, representing the word “and,” as an inclusive term? The Talmud refutes this suggestion: It can be understood even if you say it is in accor
§ A baraita states: With regard to the daughter of a priest, when she returns to her father’s house after having been married to a non-priest and then separated from her husband, she returns to partaking of teruma but she does not return to partake of the breast and right hind leg of peace-offering