Study Temurah folio 31B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
If animals consecrated for the altar became pregnant and then became blemished and gave birth after redemption, their offspring and their milk are forbidden after their redemption. And one who slaughters them outside the Temple courtyard is liable to receive karet. And the Temple treasurer does not
There are elements that apply to items consecrated for Temple maintenance that do not apply to animals consecrated for the altar, in that unspecified consecrations are designated for Temple maintenance; consecration for Temple maintenance takes effect on all items; and one is liable to bring a guilt
Talmud: The Talmud questions the statement of the Mishnah that an item consecrated for the altar renders an animal exchanged for it a substitute: And is it an established principle that anything consecrated for the altar renders an animal exchanged for it a substitute? But there are offerings broug
The Talmud raises a difficulty: But there is the offspring of an animal consecrated for the altar, which is consecrated for the altar, and yet we learned in a Mishnah (Temura 12a): The offspring of an animal consecrated for the altar does not render an animal exchanged for it a substitute. The Talm
The Talmud objects: But there is the case of a substitute itself, which is consecrated for the altar, and yet we learned in that Mishnah (12a): A substitute does not render an animal exchanged for it a substitute. The Talmud responds: When this principle, that all animals consecrated for the altar