Study Temurah folio 26A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
Talmud: R' Yitzḥak, son of R' Yosei, says that R' Yoḥanan says, with regard to the disagreement between R' Meir and R' Yosei: Everyone concedes in a case where one says: The consecration of this animal as a substitute for a burnt offering will take effect and afterward the consecration of this an
Likewise, everyone agrees that in a case where one says: Consecration of this animal as a substitute for a burnt offering shall not take effect unless the consecration of this animal as a substitute for a peace offering shall also take effect, the animal is consecrated as both a burnt offering and
R' Meir and R' Yosei disagree only with regard to a case such as the one in our Mishnah, where one said: This animal is the substitute of the burnt offering, the substitute of the peace offering. As R' Meir holds: Since if he wanted both sanctities to take effect, he should have said: The substitut
And R' Yosei holds that from the outset he intended for both sanctities to take effect, and he did not say: The substitute of the burnt offering and the peace offering, because he reasoned that if he said that, one would say that he intends for the animal to be consecrated with two sanctities, half
§ A baraita states: In the case of one who had two animals standing before him, one a burnt offering and one a peace offering, and he said with regard to one of his non-sacred animals: This animal, half of it is the substitute of the burnt offering, and half of it is the substitute of the peace offe