Study Temurah folio 19A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
But with regard to the offspring of the substitute of a guilt offering, where there is no burnt offering status for its mother, as the animal for which it was substituted was a guilt offering, R' Elazar concedes that an animal purchased with its money, received from selling the offspring, yes, it
Abaye raised an objection to Rava: And does R' Elazar require that there be burnt offering status for its mother, in order for the offspring to be sacrificed as a burnt offering? But isn’t it taught in a baraita: In the case of one who designates a female animal for his Paschal offering, which mus
If the animal remained without a blemish until after Passover, it is left to graze until it becomes unfit, and he brings a peace offering with the money received for its sale. If it gave birth to a male after Passover, the offspring too is left to graze until it becomes unfit, and then it is sold, a
Abaye explains his objection: But here, it is a case where there is no peace offering status for its mother, as the mother was consecrated as a Paschal offering, and yet R' Elazar says that the offspring is sacrificed as a peace offering. Rava said to Abaye in response: Do you say that this state
Abaye asked Rava: If so, that the reason R' Elazar permits the offspring to be sacrificed is that the mother also has the status of a peace offering, let R' Elazar also disagree with the Rabbis in the first clause of the baraita, where the female animal designated as a Paschal offering gave birth b