Study Temurah folio 11A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
R' Zeira answered that this is what the Mishnah is saying: One consecrates certain animal’s limbs, and the sanctity extends to the entire animal. And therefore, one substitutes these animals despite the fact that he initially consecrated only the limbs. But one does not substitute the limbs alone o
R' Yirmeya objected: If the Mishnah is referring to the offspring of sacrificial animals, and it is teaching that it is only when they are in their mother’s womb that one may not render a substitute for them, one can infer that once they are outside their mother’s womb, one can render a substitute f
R' Yirmeya objected: If the Mishnah is in accordance with the opinion of R' Yehuda, one encounters a difficulty. According to R' Yehuda, are limbs consecrated in this manner, in that the sanctity extends to the whole animal? But R' Yehuda does not accept that if one says: The hind leg of this anima
R' Zeira said to him: What are we dealing with here? We are dealing with an item whose removal renders it a tereifa, i.e., will cause it to die within 12 months. R' Yehuda’s ruling that the consecration of a limb does not extend to the entire animal applies only to limbs whose removal would not re
§ The Talmud suggests. Let us say that the dispute between bar Padda and R' Yoḥanan is parallel to a dispute between tanna’im, as we learned: If one slaughtered a pregnant animal that was consecrated as a sin offering, and he found inside it a female fetus 4 months old, which is alive, despite th