Study Taanit folio 14A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
But he omitted any mention of the ark and the halakha that during the last 7 fast days the ark was brought into the streets of the city. The Talmud rejects this argument: If the omission is due to the ark, that is not a real omission. The reason is that the tanna teaches only matters that are perf
Rav Ashi said: The wording of the Mishnah is also precise, according to this explanation, as it teaches: How are these 7 fast days more stringent than the first ones? Rather, the difference is that on these days, in addition to all the earlier stringencies, they sound the alarm and they lock the
The Talmud asks: And how can you understand the phrase: How are these, specifically, as indicating that there is only one difference between the cases? But he omitted the ark. The Talmud responds: If the omission is due to the ark, that is not a real omission, because the tanna includes it in ano
Since no decisive proof was offered in support of any of the opinions as to where an individual inserts the Aneinu prayer, the Talmud asks: What halakhic conclusion was reached about this matter? R' Shmuel bar Sasretai said, and similarly Rav Ḥiyya bar Ashi said that Rav said: One inserts it betwee
§ It is taught in one baraita: Pregnant and nursing women fast with the community on the first fasts, but they do not fast on the last fasts. And it was taught in another baraita: Pregnant and nursing women fast on the last set of fasts but they do not fast on the first set of fasts. And it was taug