Study Sukkah folio 37B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
By inference, if he spilled the ashes intentionally from the tube into the water, it is fit. Why? Doesn’t God say in the Torah: “And for the impure they shall take of the ashes of the burning of the purification from sin, and he places running water upon them in a vessel” (Numbers 19:17). Apparentl
And Rabba said with regard to the lulav: After binding the myrtle branches and willow branches, let a person not insert the lulav into the binding of the 4 species, as perhaps as a result the leaves will fall from the branches and the leaves will constitute an interposition between the various speci
And Rabba said: Let a person not cut the lulav in order to shorten it while it is in the binding of the 4 species, as perhaps as a result leaves will become detached and will constitute an interposition between the various species. And Rava said: An object of one species does not interpose before a
§ And Rabba said: It is prohibited to smell the myrtle branch used in fulfillment of the mitzva. However, it is permitted to smell the etrog used in fulfillment of the mitzva. The Talmud asks: What is the reason for the distinction between them? The Talmud answers: With regard to a myrtle branch,
And Rabba said: With regard to a myrtle branch, while it is attached to the tree, it is permitted to smell it on Shabbat. With regard to an etrog, while it is attached to the tree, it is prohibited to smell it. The Talmud explains: What is the reason for the difference between them? With regard to