Study Shabbat folio 97B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
Is that to say that R' Yehuda HaNasi deems one liable for a subcategory of prohibited labor when performed with a primary category of prohibited labor? After all, carrying out and carrying in constitute a primary category of prohibited labor and its subcategory.
Wasn’t it taught in a baraita that R' Yehuda HaNasi says that Shabbat is mentioned in the verse: “These are the things [eleh hadevarim] that God has commanded to perform them” (Exodus 35:1)? Several points are derived from the superfluous emphases in this verse. The Torah could simply have stated: T
Rav Yosef said to him: The Master taught Rav Yehuda’s statement with regard to this, and consequently, he encounters a difficulty. One statement of R' Yehuda HaNasi contradicts another statement of R' Yehuda HaNasi. We learn the statement of Rav Yehuda with regard to the opinion of R' Yehuda, and t
As it was taught in a baraita: With regard to one who threw an object from the private domain to the public domain, and it traveled 4 cubits in the public domain, R' Yehuda deems him liable and the Rabbis deem him exempt.
Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said: R' Yehuda would deem him liable to bring two sin-offerings in this case, one for carrying out from the private domain into the public domain and one for carrying the object 4 cubits through the public domain. The Rabbis deem him exempt for carrying 4 cubits in the p