Study Shabbat folio 69B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
Therefore, Abaye teaches us that this is not so. The Talmud raises an objection from a baraita: What is an unwitting violation of an oath on a statement relating to the past? What is an example of one who unwittingly swore falsely with regard to an incident that occurred in the past? It cannot be a
There is another version of the discussion of Abaye’s statement where, after quoting the halakha with regard to an oath on a statement, the question was raised: In accordance with whose opinion is this Mishnah? If you say it is in accordance with the opinion of Munbaz, that is obvious: Now, if thr
And Abaye said: Everyone agrees with regard to teruma that one is only liable to add a payment of 1/5th the value of the teruma for eating it unwittingly if he is unwitting with regard to its prohibition. The Talmud asks: To whose opinion is Abaye referring in the phrase: Everyone agrees? Certainl
Rav Huna said: One who was walking along the way or in the desert, and he does not know when Shabbat occurs, he counts 6 days from the day that he realized that he lost track of Shabbat and then observes one day as Shabbat. Ḥiyya bar Rav says: He first observes one day as Shabbat and then he counts
The Talmud asks: If so, if that is what the baraita meant, why employ the phrase: He observes one day for 6? It should have stated: He observes one day and counts 6. And furthermore, it was taught in a baraita: If one was walking along the way or was in the desert, and he does not know when Shabbat