Study Sanhedrin folio 113A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
The Talmud challenges: And let him redeem that which was purchased with second-tithe money and became ritually impure, as we learned in a Mishnah (Ma’aser Sheni 3:10): An item that is purchased with second-tithe money and that became ritually impure shall be redeemed. The Talmud answers: The Mishna
Rather, actually, the case in the Mishnah is with regard to pure second-tithe produce of an idolatrous city that was taken into Jerusalem, and it is a case where the walls of Jerusalem then fell. And this halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rava, as Rava says: The capacity of the wall of
§ The Mishnah teaches: Sacred scrolls must be interred. The Talmud comments: The halakha cited in the Mishnah is not in accordance with the opinion of R' Eliezer, as it is taught in a baraita that R' Eliezer says: Any city in which there is even one mezuza is not rendered an idolatrous city, as it
The Mishnah teaches that R' Shimon says: God says: If you implement judgment on an idolatrous city, I ascribe you credit as though you have sacrificed an entirely burnt offering before Me, and R' Akiva and R' Yosei HaGelili disagree as to whether one may convert the ruins of the idolatrous city int
On that basis, say that the dispute is that one Sage, R' Yosei HaGelili, is of the opinion that the ruling is in accordance with the opinion of R' Avin, and one Sage, R' Akiva, is of the opinion that the ruling is not in accordance with the opinion of R' Avin. R' Yosei HaGelili holds that the pos