Study Pesachim folio 63B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
or to one of the members of the group; and he is liable only if the leaven is with him in the Temple courtyard itself. R' Yoḥanan said: He is liable even if the leaven is not with him in the Temple courtyard. With regard to what principle do they disagree? If you say that they disagree with regard
As we learned in a Mishnah: With regard to one who slaughters a thanks-offering inside the Temple courtyard while its bread, namely the 40 loaves that are brought together with the offering, is outside the wall, the bread has not become sanctified, as the verse states: “And he shall offer with the
A question was raised with regard to this Mishnah: What is the meaning of the phrase outside the wall? R' Yoḥanan said: It means outside the wall of Beit Pagei, the outermost wall around Jerusalem, but if the bread was merely outside the wall of the Temple courtyard, it has been sanctified, as we
Rather, say that they disagree about an uncertain warning. There is a general rule that the courts only administer corporal punishment if the transgressor was warned before he committed the transgression. The question arises as to whether punishments are administered after an uncertain warning, i.
As it was stated that if a person said: I take an oath that I will eat this loaf today, and the day passed and he did not eat it, R' Yoḥanan and R' Shimon ben Lakish both said that he is not flogged even though he violated his oath and thereby transgressed the prohibition of: “You shall not take the