Study Nedarim folio 44B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
And that ordinance could lead to a problem, as perhaps he will come to tithe from produce that requires tithing by Torah law for produce exempt from tithing by Torah law and from produce exempt from tithing by Torah law for produce that requires tithing by Torah law. By Torah law, the produce is not
The Talmud answers: That problem will not arise, because if the declaration of ownerless status is retracted after 3 days, we say to the person who ultimately takes possession of the produce: When you tithe, tithe from that produce itself. In that way, the above problem does not arise.
The Talmud raises an objection from a baraita: One who declares his vineyard ownerless, and at dawn he arose and picked grapes from the vineyard, is obligated in the mitzva of leaving individual fallen grapes left for the poor [peret], and in the mitzva of leaving incompletely formed clusters of gra
The Talmud asks: Granted, this is so according to Ulla, who explained that the Rabbis taught the previous baraita and explains that although the rabbis instituted that the ownerless status does not take effect completely until 3 days have passed, by Torah law it takes effect immediately, and that
The Talmud answers that Reish Lakish could have said to you: Although when I explained the first clause and the latter clause of that baraita I said that both are in accordance with the opinion of R' Yosei, who said that an ownerless item leaves the possession of the owner only when it enters the