Study Nedarim folio 33A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
The Talmud asks: But didn’t he vow that he is prohibited from partaking of food, and those items are not food items? R' Shimon ben Lakish said: The Mishnah is referring to a case where he says: Benefit from your food is forbidden to me, which includes any benefit associated with food.
The Talmud asks: Say that the result of a vow formulated in that manner is that he may not chew wheat kernels belonging to the one from whose food benefit is forbidden and place them on his wound, as that is a benefit that results from food. However, that vow does not render items used in the prepa
Rav Pappa said: Borrowing from him a sack in which to bring produce, or a donkey upon which to bring produce, or even merely a basket, each renders benefit that leads to food, and this benefit is forbidden. Rav Pappa raised a dilemma: If he seeks to borrow a horse upon which to ride or a ring wi
The Talmud proposes: Come and hear a proof from the Mishnah: However, he may lend him a garment, and a cloak, and nose rings, and finger rings. The Talmud asks: What are the circumstances of that situation? If we say it is a case where it is not the borrower’s intent to be seen with them, and ther
The Talmud refutes this. No, actually the Mishnah is referring to a case where he borrowed those items with the intention not to be seen with them. In response to the question: Is it necessary to say so, the Talmud answers that it is not necessary to teach this halakha. However, since it is taught i