Study Nazir folio 32A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
and the 11th. It is a Torah edict that the consecration takes effect with regard to those two animals. Therefore, one cannot infer from this case that an erroneous act of consecration takes effect.
Talmud: The Talmud asks: Whose opinion is expressed in the Mishnah, when it rules that one whose request to dissolve his vow was rejected by a halakhic authority counts the duration of his naziriteship from the moment he took the vow, including the days on which he did not observe the halakhot of
As it is taught in a baraita (Tosefta Nedarim 1:6): With regard to one who took a vow of naziriteship and later transgressed his vow of naziriteship by drinking wine, the halakhic authorities do not attend to his request to dissolve his vow, nor do they let him complete his term as a nazirite by sac
The Talmud elaborates: Which of these opinions might correspond to that of the Mishnah? If it is that of the Rabbis, it is difficult with respect to a short naziriteship, i.e., a standard term of naziriteship, which lasts for 30 days. The Rabbis maintain that he cannot include all the days from th
The Talmud answers: If you wish, you can say that the Mishnah is in accordance with the opinion of R' Yosei, and if you wish, you can say it is in accordance with the opinion of the Rabbis. The Talmud explains: If you wish, you can say that the Mishnah is in accordance with R' Yosei: Here, the