Study Menachot folio 108A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
And one was for the value of the lambs brought as a nazirite’s or a metzora’s guilt offering. And one was for the value of the goats brought as communal sin offerings on Festivals. And one was for the surplus coins of one who designated money to purchase one of those offerings and had money left ove
After citing these 4 opinions, the Talmud explains: All of the other rabbis do not say in accordance with the explanation of Ḥizkiyya that the 6 collection horns are to prevent quarrels between the families of priests, as they hold that we are not concerned about quarreling between the priests. Ther
The other rabbis do not say in accordance with the explanation of R' Yoḥanan that the 6 horns are to prevent the coins from decaying, as we are not concerned that the coins will decay.
The other rabbis do not say in accordance with the explanation of Ze’eiri that the Mishnah is in accordance with the opinion of R' Yehuda HaNasi, because we do not interpret a Mishnah in accordance with an individual opinion against the majority opinion.
The other rabbis also do not say in accordance with the explanation of bar Padda that the 6 collection horns were for the value of bulls, rams, lambs, and goats that had been lost, for the surplus coins left over after purchasing an offering, and for the ma’a paid as a premium in addition to the hal