Study Kiddushin folio 54B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
The Talmud answers: The baraita and the Mishnah in tractate Nedarim are two tanna’im and they disagree with regard to the opinion of R' Yehuda concerning whether or not he holds that Jerusalem itself was sanctified.
Ulla said a different opinion in the name of bar Padda: R' Meir would say: Consecrated property is desacralized if misused intentionally; it is not desacralized if misused unwittingly. And they said that consecrated property that is misused unwittingly is desacralized only with regard to an offerin
Rather, when Ravin came from Eretz Yisrael he explained it this way in the name of bar Padda: R' Meir would say: Consecrated property is desacralized if misused intentionally; it is not desacralized if misused unwittingly. And they said that consecrated property that is misused unwittingly is desac
§ Rav Naḥman says that Rav Adda bar Ahava says: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of R' Meir with regard to second tithe in that it is considered consecrated, as the tanna taught us an unattributed Mishnah in accordance with his opinion. And the halakha is in accordance with the opinion
The Talmud clarifies this statement: What is the unattributed Mishnah that is in accordance with the opinion of R' Meir with regard to second tithe? It is as we learned (Pe’a 7:6): It is prohibited to eat or derive benefit from fruit during the first 3 years after the tree is planted. The fruit of