Study Ketubot folio 94B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
And Shmuel said his ruling in accordance with the opinion of R' Elazar, who said that witnesses of the transmission effect the transaction, i.e., the act of transferring the legal document to the beneficiary causes the transaction to take effect. Therefore, the fact that the two documents bear the s
The Talmud responds: No, it is possible to say that everyone holds in accordance with the opinion of R' Elazar, and here they disagree about the following: Rav holds that in a case of a doubt that cannot be resolved with regard to monetary law, division is preferable, and Shmuel holds that leaving
The Talmud asks: Can you really establish that the opinion of Rav is in accordance with the opinion of R' Elazar? Didn’t Rav Yehuda say that Rav said: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of R' Elazar with regard to bills of divorce? And Rav Yehuda related further: When I said this halakha
The Talmud raises an objection from a baraita: In the case of two deeds that are issued dated the same day, the recipients of the deeds divide the property equally. Is this not a conclusive refutation of the opinion of Shmuel? The Talmud answers that Shmuel could have said to you: In accordance w
The Talmud continues to ask: If this baraita is in accordance with the opinion of R' Meir, say the latter clause of that same baraita: If he wrote a deed to one individual and then transmitted it to another individual, the one to whom the deed was transmitted has acquired the property. If the barait