Study Ketubot folio 84B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
The Talmud asks: And according to R' Akiva, is the seizure of a debtor’s assets by a creditor, though there are others who have a more immediate right to the assets, not effective at all? Rava said that Rav Naḥman said: And this, that R' Akiva agrees that the seizure of assets is effective, is the
The Talmud asks: And according to R' Tarfon, who holds that whoever first takes possession of the produce has acquired it, where was this produce placed? The Talmud presents a dispute: There is the opinion of Rav and Shmuel, who both say: And this, that whoever first takes possession of the produ
The Talmud relates: There were judges who judged a case of this kind in accordance with the opinion of R' Tarfon, and Reish Lakish reversed their action. He dismissed the judges’ decision and restored the money to the heirs, in accordance with the opinion of R' Akiva. R' Yoḥanan criticized his ruli
The Talmud suggests: Let us say that they disagree about this: That one Sage, Reish Lakish, holds that if one erred in a matter that appears in the Mishnah, the decision is revoked. And one Sage, R' Yoḥanan, holds that if one erred in a matter that appears in the Mishnah, the decision is not rev
The Talmud refutes this suggestion: No, it can be explained that according to everyone, where the judge erred in a matter that appears in the Mishnah, the decision is revoked, and here they disagree about this: One Sage, R' Yoḥanan, holds that the halakha is in accordance with the opinion of R'