Study Ketubot folio 49B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
That even with regard to his daughter, there is no obligation to provide her sustenance, however, there is a mitzva to do so.
And if you wish, say that the Mishnah is in accordance with the opinion of R' Yehuda, and this what he said in the Mishnah: A father is not obligated to provide sustenance for his daughter, and all the more so he is not duty-bound to provide for his son. It may be inferred from here that there is a
And if you wish, say that the Mishnah is in accordance with the opinion of R' Yoḥanan ben Beroka, and this is what he said in the Mishnah: A father is not obligated to provide sustenance for his daughter, and the same is true with regard to providing for his son. And the same is true with regard to
§ R' Ile’a said that Reish Lakish said in the name of R' Yehuda bar Ḥanina: In Usha the rabbis instituted that a man should sustain his sons and daughters when they are minors. A dilemma was raised before the rabbis: Is the halakha in accordance with his opinion or is the halakha not in accordance w
When they would come before Rav Ḥisda to register a similar complaint, he would say to them: Turn over a mortar for him in public, as a raised platform, and let that father stand up and say about himself: The raven wants to care for its sons, and yet this man does not want to support his sons. The