Study Ketubot folio 105A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
She takes an oath at the end of their marriage, i.e., when she learns that her husband died. The oath is to the effect that he did not leave her any funds when he departed overseas, as she is claiming full payment of her marriage contract. And she does not take an oath at the outset of his trip over
Talmud: The Mishnah states that there were two judges who issued decrees [gezeirot] in Jerusalem. And the Talmud raises a contradiction from the following baraita: There were 3 judges who adjudicated cases of theft [gezeilot] in Jerusalem: Admon ben Gaddai, Ḥanan the Egyptian, and Ḥanan ben Avishal
The Talmud continues: Granted, the contradiction between the statement that there were 3 judges and the statement that there were two is not difficult, as those who are important to him the tanna teaches in the Mishnah, and those who are not important to him the tanna does not teach in the Mishnah
Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: There is no contradiction, as they would issue decrees concerning matters of theft, as it is taught in a baraita: With regard to an animal that severed a young plant in the field of another, R' Yosei says that those who issue decrees in Jerusalem said: For a plant one
The Talmud raises a contradiction between the baraita cited above and another baraita: There were 3 prominent judges who issued decrees in Jerusalem: Admon, Ḥanan, and Naḥum. In the previous baraita, Naḥum was not listed. Rav Pappa said: Who is the tanna who taught that the third judge was Naḥum? I