Study Keritot folio 7A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
With regard to the daughter of a priest who married an Israelite and then unwittingly partook of teruma, she pays the principal, as a thief would, as she partook of teruma to which she owns no rights. But she does not pay the additional 1/5th payment, which is the fine paid by an Israelite who part
By contrast, if she married one of those who are unfit for her to marry due to his lineage, thereby disqualifying herself from the priesthood for the future, she pays the principal and the additional 1/5th payment, and her death is by strangulation, as is the halakha with regard to Israelite women.
And the Rabbis say: In both this case and that case, whether she was married to an Israelite or to one unfit for her to marry, she pays the principal but she does not pay the additional 1/5th payment, and her death is by burning, as she previously had the status of a daughter of the priesthood. Th
Rav Yosef said the dispute between R' Meir and R' Yehuda applies to the placing of the anointing oil, and it is explained by those answers that we answered earlier, that according to R' Meir one is liable for the placing of any amount, as the verse uses an expression of applying, whereas according t
The Talmud discusses the matter itself: A tanna teaches a baraita before R' Elazar: Anyone included in the obligation not to apply anointing oil to himself or others is likewise included as the object of: It shall not be applied, i.e., it is prohibited to apply the oil to him. And anyone not includ