Study Keritot folio 3B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
Rather, it is referring to a case where one says to himself that this is permitted. He is under the impression that idol worship is permitted, and his unwitting act was the result of ignorance, not forgetfulness. As, Rava raised a dilemma before Rav Naḥman with regard to Shabbat only so it could b
Rav Pappa says: You find an act performed unwittingly with regard to idol worship in the case of a child who was taken captive among the non-Jews and never taught about the Torah, as he knows that idol worship in general is prohibited, but with regard to these particular objects of idol worship that
And if you wish, say instead: You may even say this ruling is stated with regard to an adult, i.e., one who was not captured by non-Jews as a child, and it is speaking of a case where he erred with regard to this verse: “You shall not make with Me gods of silver and gods of gold, you shall not mak
Rav Aḥa, son of Rav Ika, said a different interpretation of the Mishnah in the name of Rav Beivai: The tanna teaches the general category of Shabbat and the general category of idol worship, without mentioning the details of how many sin offerings one would be liable to bring for transgressing eac
The rabbis say in response to this inference: The tanna of the Mishnah teaches those prohibitions that are written explicitly in the Torah; he does not teach those prohibitions that are not written explicitly but are derived from the verses. That is the reason he does not teach the case of sex with