Study Keritot folio 11A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
That the Torah established her status so that the one who has sex with her intentionally is like the one who does so unwittingly, as both are liable to bring a guilt offering, whereas one who has sex with those with whom sex are forbidden is liable to bring a sin offering only when he does so unwit
Who is the espoused female slave in question? It is any woman who is half-female slave half-free woman, i.e., a female slave who belonged to two masters, one of whom liberated her, as it is stated: “And she was redeemed and not redeemed” (Leviticus 19:20), which means that she was partially but not
Talmud: The Mishnah teaches that in the case of an espoused female slave the Torah did not equate the man with the woman. The Talmud asks: From where do we derive that she is flogged and that he is not flogged? As A baraita states: The verse states: “And if a man lies carnally with a woman, and she
And from where is it derived that this word inspection [bikkoret] is a term for flogging? R' Yitzḥak said: It indicates that she shall be subjected to the reciting of [bikra’ei] the verses, as it is taught in a baraita: The procedure for administering lashes is that before each lash is administered
A baraita states: At the time that, i.e., in any case where, the woman is flogged, the man brings an offering. In a case where the woman is not flogged, the man does not bring an offering. The Talmud asks: From where do we derive this? Rava said that it is as it is written: “And if a man lies car