Study Eruvin folio 75A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
I would have said that the residence of a non-Jew is considered a residence with regard to defining an area as an alleyway. Therefore, he teaches us that the legal status of the residence of a non-Jew is not considered a full-fledged residence in this regard. And if Rav had taught this halakha only
Now that Rav has said that this halakha applies even to a courtyard, this implies that the reason for the opinion of Rav is that he holds: It is prohibited for an individual to establish his home in the place where a non-Jew resides. Consequently, he is prohibited from establishing an eiruv, so tha
Rav Yosef said: If so, this is why I heard R' Tavla say: A non-Jew, a non-Jew, two times while teaching this subject, even though I did not understand then what he meant to say. Now I realize that he was speaking about both an alleyway and a courtyard.
Mishnah: With regard to two courtyards, one of which was within the other, and the outer one opened into the public domain, the following distinctions apply: If the inner courtyard established an eiruv for itself and the outer one did not establish an eiruv, carrying in the inner one is permitted
If the outer courtyard established an eiruv and the inner one did not, carrying in both is prohibited, as the residents of the inner courtyard pass through the outer one, and are considered to a certain extent as residents of the courtyard who did not participate in the eiruv. If this courtyard es