Study Eruvin folio 49B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
And there is another practical difference between them with regard to the question whether a minor may collect the eiruv from the residents of the courtyard and deposit it in one of the houses. According to Shmuel’s opinion, this would not be a valid eiruv, for a minor cannot serve as an agent to ef
Abaye said to Rabba: It is difficult according to your opinion that an eiruv is effective based on the principle of residence, and it is difficult according to the opinion of Shmuel that it is effective based on the principle of acquisition. As it was taught in a baraita: With regard to 5 people who
Rabba said to him: It is neither difficult according to my opinion, nor is it difficult according to the opinion of Shmuel, as, the person who takes the eiruv acts as an agent, effecting acquisition or determining residence on behalf of all of them.
With regard to the case of the 3 courtyards addressed above, Rabba said that Rav Ḥama bar Gurya said that Rav said: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of R' Shimon that it is permitted to carry from the middle courtyard into either of the two outer ones; and vice versa, however, it is pr
Mishnah: With regard to one who was coming along the way on Friday, and it grew dark while he was traveling, and he was familiar with a tree or a fence located 2,000 cubits from his current location, and 2,000 cubits from his house, and he said: My residence is beneath that tree, rather than in his