Study Eruvin folio 37A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
may say: Two log of the 100 log present here, which I will separate in the future, when I have finished drinking, shall be the great teruma given to a priest; 10 log shall be first tithe; and 9 log, which are a tenth of the remaining 90 log, shall be second tithe. He then redeems the second-tithe
Ulla also took note of this contradiction between the statements of R' Yehuda, but he said the opposite: The statement of Ayo should not be accepted because it contradicts what is stated in the Mishnah. The Talmud raises a difficulty: But that which was taught in the Tosefta: R' Yehuda, R' Yosei, a
Ulla taught the names of the authorities mentioned in the Tosefta dealing with wine in pairs, as follows: The allowance mentioned in the Tosefta is according to the statement of R' Meir and R' Yehuda, whereas R' Yosei and R' Shimon prohibit drinking the wine in this manner. Therefore, R' Yehuda ag
To this point, it has been accepted that R' Yosei clearly prohibits the procedure described in the Tosefta. Therefore, he apparently rejects the principle of retroactive designation. With regard to this point, the Talmud asks: Does R' Yosei really hold that there is no retroactive designation? Didn’
Rabba said: There is no proof from there, with regard to retroactive designation, as the Mishnah there deals with a special case, where the women stipulated from the outset that the priest would decide which bird would be offered for which woman and as what sacrifice.