Study Chullin folio 87B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
or with blood of the undomesticated animal that did not flow from the neck and does not require covering, one views the blood as though it is water. R' Yehuda says: Blood does not nullify blood. Therefore, even if the undomesticated animal’s blood, which one must cover, is not recognizable in this
With regard to blood that spurts outside the pit over which the animal was slaughtered, or onto a wall, and blood that remained on the slaughtering knife, one is obligated to cover it. R' Yehuda said: When is this the halakha? When no blood remains there from the slaughter except that blood. But if
Talmud: We learned in a Mishnah there (Zevaḥim 77b): In the case of blood of an offering fit for sacrifice that was mixed with water, if the mixture has the appearance of blood it is fit for sprinkling on the altar, even though the majority of the mixture is water. If the blood was mixed with red w
The Mishnah teaches that in a case where water became mixed with the blood of an offering, if the mixture has the appearance of blood it is fit, despite the fact that there is more water than blood. Concerning this R' Ḥiyya bar Abba says that R' Yoḥanan says: They taught this halakha only in a case
Rav Pappa says: But with regard to the mitzva of covering the blood of birds or undomesticated animals that are slaughtered, it is not so. In this case, even if the blood fell into water the mitzva of covering applies to it, provided the mixture has the appearance of blood. The blood is not nullifi