Study Chullin folio 80B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
Therefore, when one slaughters a mother and its offspring that are both sacrificial animals outside the Temple courtyard, with regard to the first, it is as if he has simply killed it without ritual slaughter, since being slaughtered outside the Temple courtyard renders it unfit. Accordingly, the s
Likewise, the same question may be asked with regard to what is taught in the Mishnah: If both animals were non-sacred and they were slaughtered inside the Temple courtyard, both of them are unfit for sacrifice. And for the slaughter of the second animal, one incurs the 40 lashes. Since we have hear
Similarly, the Mishnah teaches: If both animals were sacrificial animals slaughtered inside the Temple courtyard, the first is fit for sacrifice, and one who slaughters it is exempt from any punishment. But for the slaughter of the second animal, one incurs the 40 lashes for the slaughter of an anim
Since we have heard that R' Shimon says: An act of slaughter that is unfit to permit consumption of the animal is not considered to have the halakhic status of an act of slaughter. One can then raise the question: An act of slaughter of sacrificial animals is also considered an act of slaughter th
The Talmud asks: Isn’t it obvious that this is so? There is no need for this long analysis. The Talmud answers: It was necessary for R' Oshaya to mention that the Mishnah is not in accordance with the opinion of R' Shimon due to the case of slaughtering an animal and its offspring that are sacrific