Study Chullin folio 75B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
the fetus requires its own slaughter to permit its consumption, and it is subject to the obligation to give the foreleg and the jaw and the maw to a priest, as is required for a non-sacred animal that is slaughtered. But nevertheless, if it dies, the fact that its mother was slaughtered serves to r
Rava said to Rav Ḥisda: Your ruling is inconsistent. When you say it requires slaughter, in accordance with whose opinion is that? It is in accordance with the opinion of R' Meir, that a live 9-month-old fetus is not permitted by virtue of its mother’s slaughter. But when you say that if it dies,
Rav Ḥisda replied: And according to your reasoning, the same difficulty arises with that which R' Ḥiyya teaches in a baraita: With regard to one who slaughtered an animal that is a tereifa and found inside it a live 9-month-old fetus, it requires its own slaughter, and it is subject to the obligati
Rava responded: That is not difficult, as it is possible that R' Ḥiyya was speaking about if one found that the fetus had already died inside the mother. In such a case, R' Meir concedes that its mother’s slaughter renders it pure, as stated in the Mishnah. Accordingly, the baraita is entirely in a
Rav Ḥisda said to Rava: According to my opinion also it is not difficult, as I claim that the entire baraita is in accordance with the opinion of the Rabbis, and although the slaughter of its mother permits the fetus, its own slaughter can also permit it, as God considers 4 simanim to be fit for sl