Study Chullin folio 34A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
with regard to the case of non-sacred food items that were prepared on the level of purity of teruma and in accordance with the opinion of R' Yehoshua. The Talmud responds: It should not enter your mind that the Mishnah is referring to a case of the level of purity of teruma, as the Mishnah teaches
The Talmud asks: Rather, what is the case in the Mishnah? Is it a case of non-sacred food items that were prepared on the level of purity of sacrificial food? Is there an undomesticated animal that can be sacrificed as an offering and its meat is sacrificial food? The Talmud answers: Although undome
Ulla said: My colleagues say that the Mishnah is referring to the case of non-sacred food items that were prepared on the level of purity of sacrificial food, and the Mishnah is not in accordance with the opinion of R' Yehoshua, who says: Non-sacred food items that were prepared on the level of pu
Ulla continues: And I say that the Mishnah is in accordance with the opinion of R' Yehoshua, and when he said that non-sacred food items that were prepared on the level of purity of teruma assume third-degree impurity, he is speaking utilizing the style of: It is not necessary. It is not necessary
The Talmud asks: Who are the colleagues to whom Ulla referred? It is Rabba bar bar Ḥana, as Rabba bar bar Ḥana says that R' Yoḥanan says: What did R' Eliezer and R' Yehoshua reply to each other? The differences between their opinions are twofold. First, R' Eliezer holds that one who eats food with