Study Chullin folio 30A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
which is cited unattributed, i.e., it is one of his many opinions that are cited in the Mishnah and baraitot without attribution. But the Rabbis say: Two people may slaughter one offering. According to the Rabbis, Rava’s difficulty remains: Let the Mishnah teach a case where they slaughtered it wi
And according to the opinion of R' Elazar, son of R' Shimon, who holds that two people may not slaughter one offering, let the tanna of the Mishnah also distinguish and teach a case where one man slaughtered with two cloths on his head, starting the slaughter with one and replacing it with the other
Rav Idi bar Avin raises an objection from a Mishnah (Pesaḥim 63a) to the opinion that halakhic slaughter is accomplished only at its conclusion. If one slaughters an animal for the sake of the Paschal offering on the 14th of Nisan after noon while he has leaven in his possession, he is flogged for v
And we discussed this matter: The reason he is liable is due to the fact that his intent was to slaughter it not for the sake of the Paschal offering, but had he slaughtered it with unspecified intent he would be exempt, because the offering would be disqualified. Unless he specifically intends oth
The Talmud asks: And why is he exempt? Doesn’t a Paschal offering sacrificed during the rest of the days of the year assume the status of a peace offering, and doesn’t one who slaughters a peace offering during the time when it is prohibited to possess leaven with leaven in his possession also vio