Study Chullin folio 126A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
And it is taught with regard to that halakha in the Mishnah that R' Yosei deems it pure. To which halakha in the Mishnah is this referring? If we say that it is referring to the latter clause of the Mishnah, which discusses a chest placed in the entrance of the house, the first tanna also deems it p
Rather, it is clear that the first tanna says that if a source of impurity is inside the compartment of a chest that is inside the house, the house is impure, either because it is typical for a source of impurity to exit its location, or because he holds that a hidden source of impurity breaks thro
§Based on the previous statement of R' Yosei, the Talmud established that R' Yosei holds that a hidden source of impurity does not break through and ascend. And the Talmud raises a contradiction between that previous statement of R' Yosei and another statement of R' Yosei.
As we learned in a Mishnah (Oholot 11:7): In the case of a dog that ate the flesh of a corpse, and the dog then died and is lying on the threshold in such a manner that its neck and mouth are facing toward the inside of the house, R' Meir says: If there is an opening the size of one cubic handbreadt
R' Yosei says: One looks to determine exactly where on the threshold the dog is located. If the impure item inside the dog is located anywhere from opposite, i.e., under, the lintel and toward the inside of the house, the house is impure. If the dog is located anywhere from opposite the lintel and