Study Chullin folio 121A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
And then he derives the halakha of liquid that emerges from orla from first fruits via a verbal analogy between one instance of the word fruit and another instance of the word fruit. With regard to orla the verse states: “And you shall count the fruit thereof as forbidden” (Leviticus 19:23), and wi
§The Mishnah teaches that the alal joins together with the flesh to constitute the requisite egg-bulk to impart the impurity of food, despite not being considered food itself. The Talmud asks: To what is the term alal referring? R' Yoḥanan says: It is referring to the nuchal ligament [marteka]. And
The Talmud raises an objection to the explanation of Reish Lakish from that which is written: “But you are plasterers of lies, you are all physicians of no value [elil]” (Job 13:4). The term “no value [elil]” stems from the same linguistic root as the word alal. Granted, according to the one who say
The Talmud answers: With regard to the term elil in the verse, everyone agrees that it is referring to the nuchal ligament. When R' Yoḥanan and Reish Lakish disagree, it is with regard to the definition of the term alal employed by the rabbis in the Mishnah.
Come and hear a resolution from that which is taught in the Mishnah: R' Yehuda says: With regard to the alal that was collected, if there is an olive-bulk of it in one place it imparts the impurity of animal carcasses. Therefore, one who eats it or touches it and then eats consecrated food or enter